Home » LucasArts Forums » Other Discussion » LucasArts General Discussion


Thread: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]



Permlink Replies: 1,311 - Pages: 66 [ Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 66 | Next ] - Last Post: Jun 3, 2013 4:38 PM Last Post By: The Truuth Threads: [ Previous | Next ]
Dr_Brody


Posts: 14
Registered: 04/29/10
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 29, 2012 1:06 AM   in response to: Darthrulak in response to: Darthrulak
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Today, I unsubbed from "The Old Republic".
Sorry LucasArts, but what Bioware delivered is unbearable and not worth a sub longer than one or two months.

Seriously, SWG, a nearly 10 year old MMO was lightyears ahead of TOR in every aspect except "voiceovers and story".

TOR is fundamentally flawed and I doubt it can be fixed. This is just a mediocre attempt on copying WOW mechanics, it does not resemble the vast worlds of Star Wars. I miss the SWG sandbox, the vast planets and a whole galaxy to explore. In TOR you are riding on a predefined linear track though lackluster, dead and corridor-like planets and when the story is over, itīs over. That game screams lazy design and mediocrity all over.

Please do something about it. But I donīt think this can be fixed, only if they would completely redesign it, which wonīt happen with these stubborn game designer who obviously hate every single good idea from SWG.

In short, Star Wars The Old Republic sucks.

Conclusion, we need SWG or even better a graphics updated SWG2, and Sony should do it.
mstewart78064

Posts: 5
Registered: 03/11/02
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 28, 2012 5:30 AM   in response to: Darthrulak in response to: Darthrulak
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
not to mention...we all bought the game played the game for years i never once got an email from LA or SOE saying thank you for paying for 5 accounts occasionally a 6th(when the wife wanted to play)Never once did (im sure all of the swg players) we even get the common curtesy of George Lucas saying his real reasoning behind pulling the plug.(though i know it was tor) In the LA website swg players for years are treated like we are the redheaded stepchild that LA wishes they didnt have. I have been a LIFELONG FAN of Star Wars and anything related. And then for us to post on a George Lucas site we have to post in the other forum the very last line...we didnt even get treated to our own forum like the rest of the crap games above Other. Every one of those games above other my 9 year old can play...takes absolutely no skill to play those...just a few minutes of your time. Please let SOE bring back our game...payed or unpaid i could care or less...i just want it back. so you by the lightswitch please flip that thing back to the up position.
mstewart78064

Posts: 5
Registered: 03/11/02
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 28, 2012 5:03 AM   in response to: Flango in response to: Flango
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
yes happy 9th b-day SWG....I keep waiting for someone to say fooled ya its back it was just a long april fools joke.
Flango

Posts: 6
Registered: 06/01/12
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 27, 2012 3:42 AM   in response to: Onasa Lear in response to: Onasa Lear
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Onasa Lear wrote:
I am begining to believe that there are more people willing to pay for SWG than to play SWTOR for free. But that's just me...

Edited by: Onasa Lear on Jun 24, 2012 6:54 PM

That is true for me too. SWTOR was enjoyable until you reach 50, and then it is just not worth it. It is like paying a monthly fee to Mass Effect 3 (A single player game with multiplayer options)

Many people had multiple accounts in SWG, and spent loads on the TCG, as the game was worth it. For it to get shut down the way it did, just sucks. The game was far from dead when they announced the shut down, it was increasing, and about a week before the shutdown announcement they had to lock down 2 more servers to transfers as they had become FULL, and another one was getting full then. The free transfers and the unplanned 45 days brought the game back to life. The breach was a blessing in disguise for SWG, and LA wasted that opportunity. Also if the game was dying they would have given 1-3 months notice for closure, and not 6 months.

Also, Happy 9th Anniversary, SWG :)

Edited by: Flango on Jun 27, 2012 3:45 AM

Onasa Lear

Posts: 2
Registered: 04/19/05
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 24, 2012 6:53 PM   in response to: Jedimonkeylizard in response to: Jedimonkeylizard
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I am begining to believe that there are more people willing to pay for SWG than to play SWTOR for free. But that's just me...

Edited by: Onasa Lear on Jun 24, 2012 6:54 PM
Jedimonkeylizard


Posts: 37
Registered: 09/01/04
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 24, 2012 11:03 AM   in response to: mstewart78064 in response to: mstewart78064
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
mstewart78064 wrote:
I would re-sub all 5 account i had just to be able to play the official game again.

I would as well for my 4 ACCOUNTS (PROVIDED i could get my 2011 characters back with all items and the 1.3 billion credits and my DiK and Dath Prison Painting and Bacta Tanks (pre-CU village not treasure box crap) and my Elder Ranger Master Commando/Master Dancer/Master DE)

mstewart78064

Posts: 5
Registered: 03/11/02
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 23, 2012 10:33 PM   in response to: Darthrulak in response to: Darthrulak
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I would re-sub all 5 account i had just to be able to play the official game again.
Lea Nikkaya


Posts: 14,001
Registered: 09/01/05
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 23, 2012 5:56 PM   in response to: Onasa Lear in response to: Onasa Lear
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
And a lot of SW fans are not playing an MMO because they want a good, immersive, deep story, and not a room full of 12 year olds. ;)
Onasa Lear

Posts: 2
Registered: 04/19/05
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 21, 2012 7:23 PM   in response to: mstewart78064 in response to: mstewart78064
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I say there are a lot of star wars fans out there not playing an mmo because swtor was such a flop. They are looking for something to fill thier wants and alot of us ( I am one ) are finding nothing worth the time or effort. Some will eventually compromise thier wants and settle for less, others will walk away form mmo's completely and some will play an emulator but alot of us still nuture the hope of seeing swg return in an official way. Is it such a bad idea? Would it be such a task to do? I know there are those who say "let it go" and it was a "dieing game". Well I couldn't say much more for swtor and the thing is I compare every mmo I play to swg. If the game came back I would resub the day it was available and I think alot of others would as well. Something to keep the fans happy.
mstewart78064

Posts: 5
Registered: 03/11/02
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 19, 2012 4:53 AM   in response to: Darthrulak in response to: Darthrulak
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
This is my 2 cents as if LA really needed it:

If nothing more but to satisfy the public on Star Wars Galaxies.

Please reopen servers to satisfy the masses that realy did love this game at one point or another.
If nothing else you would profit from the content that was already there.

Open
1 Pre-cu server(add more if needed)
1 Pre-cu test center

1 Cu server(add more if needed)
1 Cu test center

1 Nge server(add more if needed)
1 Nge test center

This would at least satisfy the masses that did love this game in its haydays of each major upgrade. This way each person that say loved the Cu could play on those servers. In my personal opinion do not allow server transfers unless there was a need to close a server. (In my personal opinion I would have been perfectly happy back on my original server) I had 4 accounts and the freedom to do whatever i chose in game. had really great friends Only reason i ever quit playing was because the announcement to shut off the servers. So I didnt even get to experience the final days which after reading some peoples comments wish i would have kept playing. This was and is by far the best mmo i have ever played. Tor is nothing but a limited wow clone. even wow is more open than tor...i was extremely dissapointed to see the many limitations of tor. i was a space junky that probably spent more time in space to see it reduced to tempest(showing my age here) was very very very stomach churning. All i have to say is thank god for screen shots of swg so i can look at all of the old stuff i used to do and my houses my ships and stuff of that nature.
Guest
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 15, 2012 5:35 PM   in response to: Flango in response to: Flango
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
So SWTOR is thinking in switch to F2P
http://massively.joystiq.com/2012/06/15/ea-boss-swtor-abso lutely-going-to-embrace-free-model/

But our game was not "viable" for it...Really nice move LA, 150+m $ wasted in a game that everyone at SWG Knew was going to fail, everyone but the blind developers and the greedy investors. (WoW clones doesn't work, people who wants to play a WoW is already playing WoW).
Can someone explain us why SWG was not viable and SWTOR is?

LA only knows how to mess with their fans, is like Lucas were tired of the people who make him rich.

SOE needed 3 years for destroy the game reputation, Eviltronic Acts and Bioware just 3 months (patch 1.2).

Bring us back our galaxies and stop dumping money in the TORtanic.
Flango

Posts: 6
Registered: 06/01/12
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 15, 2012 4:26 AM   in response to: Char Ell in response to: Char Ell
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Char Ell wrote:
Jedimonkeylizard wrote:
Char....you are missing a major point.

As for the F2P point about SW:G you missed the point.

Your bosses didn't let SOE take SW:G F2P. And I can state that with authority...

SOE Employee ID Number 10006789
Job description: EQ2/EQ/RoTW Developer
Name: John Van Roekel

LOL. Just to be clear, I don't view LucasArts as my boss. I haven't even communicated with anybody from LucasArts or Lucas Online in over a year and they don't pay me to be a moderator here. I'm here solely when I choose to be and because I choose to be. Sure I guess LucasArts could decide to "fire" me and change me back to regular member status but that wouldn't bother me in the least.

I have no idea who decided SWG wouldn't go free-to-play. It may well have been LucasArts' decision. Regardless, my point was SWG is already closed and I believe trying to bring it back at this point would require substantially more resources than LucasArts or SOE would be willing to provide. We can discuss all the reasons why LucasArts should bring SWG back but until LucasArts is convinced and free from any not publicly known contractual obligations that would prevent another adult-targeted SW MMO from co-existing with TOR then it's just so much talk. I respect and understand those of you who want to convince LucasArts to bring SWG back but as for myself I really don't care one way or the other. Bring SWG back is fine or don't works too. I didn't play SWG before it closed and unless they made specific changes to SWG I wouldn't play the game even if it did return to existence.


lucasarts.com terms of use
Forum Rules
Who are the Moderators?

I do not think it will involve much resources to bring back SWG, but it is more down to pride and SOE and LA possibly falling out, as after SWG closed Smedley stated that going forward they will largely going to concentrate on their own IPs, as will not have this problem of having to shut down a game, before its time, which shows he was a but annoyed by LA as they have put him off dealing with outside IPs

SWG is already written, and so will not need $300 million to create, just needs some who will be able to host it. I am sure there are some SWG fans who would be willing to host it for you for free. SWG is well worth the money. The only money involved maybe to buy SOE back, or buy the code off them, if they are the ones who still have it and not LA

As stated earlier SWG showed the potential of F2P when SOE customers were given 45 free days, which quadupled the population. If the game was ongoing free and not just 45 days then more would have played too, and then if offererd to everyone then a tonne more would have played on top. I bet most of those playing the full 45 days would have resubbed too, but did not, because SOE announceed it shutdown. If people were only logging in to test the game briefly they would not have sustained 4 full servers for the solid 45 days. SOE/LA lost a lot of revenue in subs by announcing the shutdown when they did.

If SWG came back as F2P, I reckon it would need at least 10 servers, unless can utilise megaservers.

SWG F2P IMO would bring in more overall long term revenue than SWTOR F2P.

The only thing holding SWG back was the monthly fee and its bad rep. Make it F2P people will it a go and then get hooked, and it will eventually be as popular as Minecraft, which has sold over 2 million on PC and Xbox 360 each. Personally I find Minecrafts graphics to be too blocky, but loads of people do not mind.

Edited by: Flango on Jun 15, 2012 4:31 AM

Jedimonkeylizard


Posts: 37
Registered: 09/01/04
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 8, 2012 1:46 PM   in response to: Char Ell in response to: Char Ell
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Char Ell wrote:
Jedimonkeylizard wrote:
Char....you are missing a major point.
LOL. Just to be clear, I don't view LucasArts as my boss. I haven't even communicated with anybody from LucasArts or Lucas Online in over a year and they don't pay me to be a moderator here. I'm here solely when I choose to be and because I choose to be. Sure I guess LucasArts could decide to "fire" me and change me back to regular member status but that wouldn't bother me in the least.

I have no idea who decided SWG wouldn't go free-to-play. It may well have been LucasArts' decision. Regardless, my point was SWG is already closed and I believe trying to bring it back at this point would require substantially more resources than LucasArts or SOE would be willing to provide. We can discuss all the reasons why LucasArts should bring SWG back but until LucasArts is convinced and free from any not publicly known contractual obligations that would prevent another adult-targeted SW MMO from co-existing with TOR then it's just so much talk. I respect and understand those of you who want to convince LucasArts to bring SWG back but as for myself I really don't care one way or the other. Bring SWG back is fine or don't works too. I didn't play SWG before it closed and unless they made specific changes to SWG I wouldn't play the game even if it did return to existence.


lucasarts.com terms of use
Forum Rules
Who are the Moderators?

Thank you for clarifying that Char...

I should then just ignore you and everything you say since you have no official LA powers.

Got it.

MTFBWYA

And you're damn right it was LA's decision for everything that went wrong with SW:G from 2004 to shutdown. You think SOE enjoyed becoming vilified by their player base?

As for your comment about how you never played it ever before it shut down....if you have no experience with the game,

Might I suggest you stay out of discussions about it...since you have nothing of value to contribute.

I'd take Master Mike as a Mod for this thread since HE actually Played SW:G in 2004

Edited by: Jedimonkeylizard on Jun 8, 2012 1:47 PM

JYCowboy


Posts: 16
Registered: 05/23/00
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 8, 2012 11:05 AM   in response to: Darthrulak in response to: Darthrulak
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I see that this thread really has no voice to Lucas Arts. This is simply a spot to catch the ire and anger of the SWG former players. If it allows fellow gamers to connect then it earns its place among Lucas Arts forums, but thats as far as they care for it.

It is well known, that many folks behind SWG hated the community and forums of SWG as a poisionious cess pool of hate. The value of community, server, and/or game pride was completely overshadowed by trolling, rage and negativity. This brought on the view that the "players ruined the game." They tolerated it only as far as it kept players paying.

With TOR, the forums are little more than a hype tool to promote the game. Any strong comment or opinion is deleted and all sense of community is stifled with no server based forums. Im sure they feel if the players want server congergation they can make it themselves, which many did. Lucas Arts learned many leasons from SWG and put them in practice with TOR. The thing is they undervalue the positives of these tools in TOR. So what if two guilds fight a ingame and forum war? In the end, players generate memories of good fights and competition. Sometimes those enemies (in a game mind you) become stronger friends. Game drama has multiple outcomes and is always best when it ends in laughter. I pity Lucas Arts in not understanding fully why they don't have a thriving growing TOR community.

Is this the one reason TOR is failing? No, the game is not designed to support gamer communities with daily activities of expanded measure. Bioware is a great RPG maker but needs more support in the MMO circle. For TOR to turn around they are going to have to invest in more than thier Fourth Pillar.

If all these other features of MMO's are so important then why did SWG fail? SWG was a buggy mess from launch to half way into the NGE era. There were plenty of problems up until closing but the game breaking stuff had been fixed well before then. What killed SWG was the launch of the NGE. The game culture had been built around finally unlocking the Alpha Class Jedi. All those players investment in the game was simply wiped away for a subpar melee class Jedi. It was easily interpered that the existing player-base was not a concern and a new target demgraphic was first choice. "Don't let the door hit you in the butt." This event echoed in forums across the internet labeling SWG a terriable game and you could not trust those that made it. This locked out both targeted and non-targeted players. A damn hard lesson that affected the whole industry.

I believe Lucas Arts is doing what it does best and is moving forward. Abandoning past investments and launching a new "Hotness". Star Wars 1313 anyone?

IMHO.
darev_sool

Posts: 1
Registered: 06/04/12
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 8, 2012 7:34 AM   in response to: Darthrulak in response to: Darthrulak
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I had 8 accounts for SWG for the last two years of the game. Back when we were told both TOR and SWG would be active I was planning on just adding TOR to that equation.

Believe me when I say that I would drop TOR in a heartbeat to play SWG again full bore like I was before.

I don't hate TOR, back when I tried to get into WOW I thought that all WOW needed to be perfect was a Star Wars skin. TOR gave me that. I have since found out that I want more from an MMO than what TOR gives me.

I want player cities, social activities, beast master, SWG style crafting including resource spawns/shifts, many different styles of combat including unarmed (Teras Kasi), free roaming space flight and content, and many more things that SWG had that no one else has to this day.

Above all else I want to shoot at stormtroopers and also to be a stormtrooper shooting at members of the rebel alliance.

THAT is Star Wars.

Edited by: darev_sool on Jun 8, 2012 7:35 AM
GA_Wulfman


Posts: 38
Registered: 01/23/01
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 7, 2012 3:12 PM   in response to: Darthrulak in response to: Darthrulak
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Well, I personally do not care if TOR does well or not, as I do not like the limited MMO gameplay it offers, however, the problem I see with TOR is that it also does not hold the players it was trying to atract.

SWG on the otehr side certainly had a lot of missed potentual, but at every phase of the game (besides maybe the first 6 month after the NGE) it had more to offer than most other games.

It seems a shame that LA never saw this and that this all of the good work done on SWG is never to see daylight again.

I miss the last days of SWG ... atmospheric flight, ship to gound combat, NPC invasions on the ground and in space with forced pvp for the last phase, everything went tradeable, players could craft the best items in game (besdies heroic sets), world PVP that changed planet status and reward points, PVP zone and local zones that could be controled by each faction, NPC drops on faction missions with high level elites, guildes could declare faction and home zones (and got bonus options for controling them), Player cities had the same features (so really you could have two home zones), ful export of all guild and pvp battelfield stat to XML ... and there is more that I did not even mention because it always stayed with SWG (player housing, real space combat, etc. etc)

I agree that it is not likely that LA will just have SOE reopen some SWG Servers again, though to be honest, I would be signing up for it in a minute.
Char Ell


Posts: 4,060
Registered: 04/07/02
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 5, 2012 6:42 AM   in response to: Jedimonkeylizard in response to: Jedimonkeylizard
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Jedimonkeylizard wrote:
Char....you are missing a major point.

As for the F2P point about SW:G you missed the point.

Your bosses didn't let SOE take SW:G F2P. And I can state that with authority...

SOE Employee ID Number 10006789
Job description: EQ2/EQ/RoTW Developer
Name: John Van Roekel


LOL. Just to be clear, I don't view LucasArts as my boss. I haven't even communicated with anybody from LucasArts or Lucas Online in over a year and they don't pay me to be a moderator here. I'm here solely when I choose to be and because I choose to be. Sure I guess LucasArts could decide to "fire" me and change me back to regular member status but that wouldn't bother me in the least.

I have no idea who decided SWG wouldn't go free-to-play. It may well have been LucasArts' decision. Regardless, my point was SWG is already closed and I believe trying to bring it back at this point would require substantially more resources than LucasArts or SOE would be willing to provide. We can discuss all the reasons why LucasArts should bring SWG back but until LucasArts is convinced and free from any not publicly known contractual obligations that would prevent another adult-targeted SW MMO from co-existing with TOR then it's just so much talk. I respect and understand those of you who want to convince LucasArts to bring SWG back but as for myself I really don't care one way or the other. Bring SWG back is fine or don't works too. I didn't play SWG before it closed and unless they made specific changes to SWG I wouldn't play the game even if it did return to existence.


lucasarts.com terms of use
Forum Rules
Who are the Moderators?
Nawabra


Posts: 4
Registered: 11/06/03
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 4, 2012 8:28 PM   in response to: Jedimonkeylizard in response to: Jedimonkeylizard
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
The truth is LA lied to us, treated as scum and forget we invested 8 years of our life in their game , spending our money btw.

We realize the numbers were very low, but keep 2 servers running one NGE and other "Classic PRe-CU" could be a great idea and a small cash flow , also a positive image for the company.

We are sure LA is spending much more money in weird things like pay good reviews from sites for their games, when keep their player base happy is better and cheaper for sure.

I'm one of those dissapointed customers who don't hesitate in talk crap about swtor at every forum, and in par is fault of your poor decisions (also the crappy game helps alot)
Jedimonkeylizard


Posts: 37
Registered: 09/01/04
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 4, 2012 2:18 PM   in response to: Nawabra in response to: Nawabra
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
@ Nawabra:

This is the Huge question that the Vets of SW:G (all vets, not just the CU or NGE or Pre-CU era players) want answered.

SWG was not pulling in Huge Population numbers if you compared it to EvE or WoW...no rose colored glasses here.

But SW:G was not going to be a threat if you stood it next to TOR.

They could have co-existed quite easily for a while, As it was Initially stated they would by both LA and SOE management.

I would have loved to see SW:G hit that golden Rare 10 years Old Birthday...

EQ hit it in 2009
UO hit it September 24, 2007 and despite a low Pop is still around.
Anarchy Online was Released in the summer of 2001 and is still around.

Just to name a few.
Nawabra


Posts: 4
Registered: 11/06/03
Re: Star Wars Galaxies: The One and Only Discussion Thread [TDE]
Posted: Jun 4, 2012 6:58 AM   in response to: Jedimonkeylizard in response to: Jedimonkeylizard
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I would like to know Why is not possible for LA run a SW:G server for the people who wants to paly a real SW experience.

I asume the SWG engine now belongs to LA, otherwise I don't know why they asked to SOE for delete it.

I think run a SWG server as if it were part of a virtual SW tour will be a great add for the starwars.com site.

"Live your own life in the SW universe, visit the planets, meet the characters and...build your own home!!"

But if Lucas thinks is too much work or money for him, just let the game code be free to use for the fans, we can run private servers by our own ways.

SWG had too much work and good ideas for just let it pass away. Too many people worked in create real virtual worlds and they and their fans deserve much more than a "disconnected from server" move along, move along...

Dude, anything would be great than stay a the fleet waiting for a warzone to pop up.!

SWTOR is nice for a solo game but is terribad as MMO and don't say about MMORPG.

LA and SOE should sit again, see the numbers of EA/BW (the real ones, 36 people at fleet, peak time 19.00 GMT, 96 at entire server. Basilisk Droid 3 weeks ago) and talk about the chances of restore the faith of many customers.

The best way for gain new customers is try to mend the old mistakes, apologize if needed and try to not commit new ones. BW/EA are commiting the same old mistakes than SOE, but nowdays there are much more things to compete with.

SWG was not a menace for SWTOR, not even the bad press of the game was in fact..., at this moment the worst menace for SWTOR is the SWTOR.

Read the forums, so many people is realizing that SWG was not so bad as they used to be forced to think, that have a SWG server would be a cool backup for keep fans paying for the IP.

People is leavig in droves and letting their money in other IPs, think about.

Legend
Helpful Answer (5 pts)
Correct Answer (10 pts)

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in all forums