Home » LucasArts Forums » Discussion » Discussion


Thread: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!



Permlink Replies: 104 - Pages: 6 [ Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next ] - Last Post: Nov 11, 2010 7:00 PM Last Post By: blackdreamhunk7
General Betzon

Posts: 673
Registered: 12/16/06
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Oct 24, 2007 7:55 PM   in response to: Lord Vader672 in response to: Lord Vader672
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
"Why are you all whining?"

I won't go into that, there are a dozen other topics in which our opinion has been made crystal clear.

"Did you ever think that maybe most types of games would be better off on a console?"

The only real "advantages" of consoles is the controller, which can work for computers as well via USB port.

"Games for consoles RARELY lag and you don't have to worry about it having the items needed to run said game. "

My computer is just a normal, work computer and it plays next-gen games (ones that were kindly released for PC) without a hint of lag with only one exception and that exception is with a Mod that allows hundreds more units than the regular 16. I don't need to worry about "the items needed to run said game"

"Yes the PC has advantages but not as much as a console."

Think again. EVERY game that I have for computer that has a console version had been better for computer than console. Every game, FPS, RTS, RPG that I have played for both has been better for computer in graphics, additional options, additional features, etc.

"Now that consoles are getting the ability to connect to the internet they are basically smaller cheaper PCs."

Everyone has a PC, most people have high-speed internet, games for PC cost $20-50 while console games are $30-70, PC games can be modified, added to, changed, etc. PCs usually have 64 multiplayer. Consoles usually have 32.

"Now FPS games can work on both a console AND the PC, but I DO think that RTS games are better off on the PC."

FPS on computer is usually better than on consoles once you get used to the controls. RTS games are becoming console exclusive (how dumb is that?) even though, as you said, they are better for the PC (MADE for the PC)

Lord Vader672

Posts: 133
Registered: 08/13/05
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Oct 24, 2007 4:29 PM   in response to: shele182 in response to: shele182
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Why are you all whining?

Did you ever think that maybe most types of games would be better off on a console? Games for consoles RARELY lag and you don't have to worry about it having the items needed to run said game. Yes the PC has advantages but not as much as a console.

Now that consoles are getting the ability to connect to the internet they are basically smaller cheaper PCs.

Now FPS games can work on both a console AND the PC, but I DO think that RTS games are better off on the PC.

BTW. You can switch out PS3 hard drives for bigger ones. (have to be laptop size)
General Betzon

Posts: 673
Registered: 12/16/06
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Oct 24, 2007 3:14 PM   in response to: walterF in response to: walterF
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Computers have TERABYTES now. 1000 gb of hard drive space. It would take some effort to fill that up now wouldn't it? Consoles may be cool but PCs can put them to shame.
walterF

Posts: 67
Registered: 05/20/07
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Oct 24, 2007 1:19 PM   in response to: shele182 in response to: shele182
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Well consoles are seriously cool. Especially the 80gig PS3s. I got one and it's SWEET! only problem is memory goes fast... maybe i can get a memory card!?
General Betzon

Posts: 673
Registered: 12/16/06
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Sep 21, 2007 5:10 PM   in response to: xcot in response to: xcot
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
When I first got wind of the WII I thought, IMMEDIATELY, about how fun an FPS would be on such an interactive system. The WII comes out and there are only a handful of FPS games out. The PC is the base for EVERY console and every game that comes out for PC is generally better then the console version of the same game. PC games can be played with console control pads via USB hookup. I have a very hard time believing that Fracture is only playable on 360 and PS3 because they are superior. There is NO way that they can best a decent gaming computer. PC and WII are more popular and profitable anyway. TFU is coming out on the DS!!! How can that be better than a gaming computer??!!? And how is Fracture more demanding graphically or whatever else than TFU? Lucas Arts will die if they follow this path.
xcot

Posts: 1
Registered: 09/20/07
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Sep 20, 2007 10:09 PM   in response to: Darth LeBeau in response to: Darth LeBeau
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
who cares about pc, it's the wii that's being left behind, anyone can tell that there aren't much shooters on wii, so you'll get more money.
Darthsidiusthe3

Posts: 178
Registered: 03/22/07
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Aug 28, 2007 10:54 AM   in response to: Darthsidiusthe3 in response to: Darthsidiusthe3
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Also i could upgrade my pc every year if i wanted to but i dont i only use my pc for school
Darthsidiusthe3

Posts: 178
Registered: 03/22/07
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Aug 28, 2007 10:49 AM   in response to: shele182 in response to: shele182
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Beacause no normal pc is tuned for the euphoria and dmm
Eagle52206

Posts: 431
Registered: 02/14/07
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Jun 19, 2007 8:32 PM   in response to: Amuro in Gundam in response to: Amuro in Gundam
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
LMAO @jediknight33. You're not the only one that has
both PC and consoles. Try play your old LA console
games on a hi rez display and see how ugly they are.
Oh, and Alienware sucks. Build your own.

And as said before, there are so many cool PC games
coming out this year, Quake wars, Cyrsis, Bioshock,
Call of Duty 4 (this one looks a bit ugly because
console is involved), Hellgate London..., etc, and LA
is a compnay going downhill so who the hell cares
about their crappy games anymore.


I agree, building your own computer is not only cheaper, but you know the exact capabilities of your system. And as far as LA going downhill, you are absolutely right. there more recent games SUCK!
Amuro in Gundam

Posts: 406
Registered: 08/15/02
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Jun 19, 2007 7:45 PM   in response to: jedikinght33 in response to: jedikinght33
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
LMAO @jediknight33. You're not the only one that has both PC and consoles. Try play your old LA console games on a hi rez display and see how ugly they are. Oh, and Alienware sucks. Build your own.

And as said before, there are so many cool PC games coming out this year, Quake wars, Cyrsis, Bioshock, Call of Duty 4 (this one looks a bit ugly because console is involved), Hellgate London..., etc, and LA is a compnay going downhill so who the hell cares about their crappy games anymore.
jedikinght33

Posts: 159
Registered: 06/08/06
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Jun 18, 2007 1:52 PM   in response to: Genral Skywalker in response to: Genral Skywalker
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
wow i don't know why everyone is getting so butthurt come on i play my pc as much if not more than my console and i have the console and pc version of every LA game i can get and the console plays better hands down its easier to play the graphics are a **** lot better (i have the best alienware computer money can buy) and just overall cheaper i spent 12000 dollars on my comp and i got better quality from a 500 dollar consol and 3000 dollar tv so i say consol all the way. the comp has amazing graphics too its just i like the consol better
Amuro in Gundam

Posts: 406
Registered: 08/15/02
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Jun 17, 2007 7:23 PM   in response to: CC_5052 in response to: CC_5052
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Well, gaming isn't cheap hobby whether it's on the
console or PC. You can spend 500+ on a 360
elite/PS3
whatever, great, but you also need to have a
nice
HDTV/monitor to enjoy high def grahpics, a nice
high
quality receiver+speaker system for truHD sound
and
audio... not to mention console games have a $60
price tag.

advertising has taken you my friend. yes, it would be
nice to have those things, but ive played mainy games
on your average year 2000 TV set with a basic sound
hook up and have fully enjoyed my games.

i guess i dont come from a modern family. yes, when i
graduate from college, i'll probly get nice a HDTV
for my xbox360 and surround sound, but my parents
would NEVER buy any of that so i could play games all
day. im not sure how many other kids have their
parents buy stuff like this, but im sure its quite
alot. their answer is always you dont need it, which
is true. i can see, i can hear, do i reall yneed an
enourmous HDTV to see every scratch on a guy's armour
or the sound of flies in my ear's when i play war
games? not really


It has nohting to do with advertising. Try game on a 1080p HDTV/monitor and experience the difference for yourself. A PS3 game on standard defintion looks not much better than a PS2 game. You do need all those stuff to enjoy hi-def gaming. If all you want is being able to paly a game, then of course you don't need them, but you'll be missing out on lots of stuff. It's like playing a PC game on a minimum spec'ed computer.
Eluqqa

Posts: 232
Registered: 01/19/06
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Jun 14, 2007 10:05 PM   in response to: MasterSash in response to: MasterSash
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I won't step into the "Console is better! No! PC!" bickering, but apparently...

"Groundbreaking" in more ways than one, this 2008 blockbuster utilizes technology only >possible on the Xbox 360? and PLAYSTATION®3.

From LucasArt's website.
Yeah sure. I'd really like to hear what are these mysterious technologies. There's nothing a PS3 or an Xbox 360 can do than a decent computer can't. I wonder if Sony and Microsoft are paying LucasArts humongous amounts to make their games exclusive to their consoles? Because PC gaming is really a huge market.
MasterSash

Posts: 104
Registered: 12/06/05
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Jun 12, 2007 4:27 AM   in response to: shele182 in response to: shele182
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I'm don't really know anything about the 360's and the PS3, but in this game overview it says "only possible on the 360, and PS3" how is that possible lol.

Anyways, LA, when KOTOR 3 comes out, it better be on PC first.

*I bet it's gonna be "only possible, on the PS3 and 360"

screw consoles, seriously.
CC_5052

Posts: 4,619
Registered: 09/16/05
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Jun 6, 2007 6:27 PM   in response to: Amuro in Gundam in response to: Amuro in Gundam
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Well, gaming isn't cheap hobby whether it's on the
console or PC. You can spend 500+ on a 360 elite/PS3
whatever, great, but you also need to have a nice
HDTV/monitor to enjoy high def grahpics, a nice high
quality receiver+speaker system for truHD sound and
audio... not to mention console games have a $60
price tag.

advertising has taken you my friend. yes, it would be nice to have those things, but ive played mainy games on your average year 2000 TV set with a basic sound hook up and have fully enjoyed my games.

i guess i dont come from a modern family. yes, when i graduate from college, i'll probly get nice a HDTV for my xbox360 and surround sound, but my parents would NEVER buy any of that so i could play games all day. im not sure how many other kids have their parents buy stuff like this, but im sure its quite alot. their answer is always you dont need it, which is true. i can see, i can hear, do i reall yneed an enourmous HDTV to see every scratch on a guy's armour or the sound of flies in my ear's when i play war games? not really
commando a men

Posts: 2,658
Registered: 12/07/04
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Jun 6, 2007 8:32 AM   in response to: Amuro in Gundam in response to: Amuro in Gundam
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
True with a PC all you really need in a monitor a tower and the game.
Amuro in Gundam

Posts: 406
Registered: 08/15/02
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Jun 3, 2007 8:32 PM   in response to: CC_5052 in response to: CC_5052
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Well, gaming isn't cheap hobby whether it's on the console or PC. You can spend 500+ on a 360 elite/PS3 whatever, great, but you also need to have a nice HDTV/monitor to enjoy high def grahpics, a nice high quality receiver+speaker system for truHD sound and audio... not to mention console games have a $60 price tag.
CC_5052

Posts: 4,619
Registered: 09/16/05
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Jun 3, 2007 6:20 PM   in response to: Amuro in Gundam in response to: Amuro in Gundam
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Let me put it this way, do you really want to
spend
the extra 100+ bucks to upgrade your computer to
spec?

100+? LOL I've been spending 2500-3000 every 12
months or so for latest processors, motherboards,
video cards, etc. It's an expensive hobby, but *I
make tons a month* so I don't really care. I have a
PS3 too, but I use it mainly as a blu-ray player, and
rarely game on it.


not sure about the rest of us here, but i dont have a high paying job that allows me to spend 1000s on a HOBBY. most of us across america, and probly the rest of the world for that matter can only afford either a console or a basic computer.

how many kids (i'll stop the line at 19, the ave. age of college freshmen) have enough money to upgrade their PCs?

PCs, like you said, are expensive to upgrade. personally, i would rather play a PC game anyday of the year, but in order to play one and get the full value of the texture, graphics, sound, etc, i would have to spend enourmous amounts of money to do so. so why not spend around 5oo for an xbox 360 and get just as much value, if not more, out of many more games?
Roman-Clone

Posts: 16
Registered: 05/03/07
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Jun 3, 2007 5:21 PM   in response to: Amuro in Gundam in response to: Amuro in Gundam
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Lucky, my parents dont even give an allowance nor a damn to me. :D

I was thinking, -oh wait- nvm

Amuro in Gundam

Posts: 406
Registered: 08/15/02
Re: Another Lucas Arts game not for the PC?!
Posted: Jun 2, 2007 7:34 PM   in response to: Mandalorian_jedi1 in response to: Mandalorian_jedi1
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Let me put it this way, do you really want to spend
the extra 100+ bucks to upgrade your computer to spec?

100+? LOL I've been spending 2500-3000 every 12 months or so for latest processors, motherboards, video cards, etc. It's an expensive hobby, but I make tons a month so I don't really care. I have a PS3 too, but I use it mainly as a blu-ray player, and rarely game on it.
Legend
Helpful Answer (5 pts)
Correct Answer (10 pts)

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in all forums